On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 23:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry     : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14383
> Subject               : hackbench regression with kernel 2.6.32-rc1
> Submitter     : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Date          : 2009-10-09 9:19 (39 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=29cd8bae396583a2ee9a3340db8c5102acf9f6fd
> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125508007510274&w=4
> Handled-By    : Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>


> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14384
> Subject         : tbench regression with 2.6.32-rc1
> Submitter       : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Date            : 2009-10-09 9:51 (39 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59abf02644c45f1591e1374ee7bb45dc757fcb88
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125508216713138&w=4
> Handled-By      : Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>



> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
> Subject         : specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels
> Submitter       : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Date            : 2009-11-06 7:38 (11 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125749310413174&w=4


Yanmin, could you please update me on the status of these regressions?

Mike seems to have done a lot to address issues while I was out, and
while I (hopefully) did read all resulting email, I must admit to
loosing track of where we stand.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to