On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
> Subject : specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels
> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zh...@linux.intel.com>
> Date : 2009-11-06 7:38 (66 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125749310413174&w=4
FWIW, I couldn't reproduce the aim7 regression with my one little disk,
the opposite in fact, attributable to cfq low_latency switch.
(don't have specjbb2005, can't try to reproduce that one)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
