On Monday 11 January 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:56:13 +0100 (CET)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still
> > should be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657
> > Subject             : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7
> > Submitter   : Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> > Date                : 2009-11-19 19:50 (53 days old)
> > References  :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4
> 
> 
> patch available in the bugzilla, and also in
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/71962/

That's in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15040 .

Are they the same bug in fact?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to