On 01/28/2010 08:24 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:02:26 -0600
> [email protected] (Jeff Garrett) wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:24:09PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:17 -0800 (PST)
>>> Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: don't use ioh resource if only have one ioh
>>>>
>>>> Please, no.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is too ugly to live.
>>>>
>>>> And it's totally unacceptable to probe every single possible PCI device 
>>>> for something like this.
>>>>
>>>> If we don't know enough about the hardware workings of those Intel bridges 
>>>> to know when they are active and how they decode things, then please let's 
>>>> just disable intel_bus.c entirely.
>>>>
>>>> There's no excuse for hacky tests like this.
>>>
>>> Ok, we'll just kill it entirely then.  I'll send a patch tomorrow
>>> unless Yinghai beats me to it.
>>
>> What about something like this (works for me, without pci=use_crs)?
>>
>> ---
>>     Remove intel_bus.c Intel-specific PCI/IOH logic
>>     
>>     Signed-off-by: Jeff Garrett <[email protected]>
> 
> Yeah, looks good.  I'll push to Linus today.
> 

please don't. will send you another patch, to keep the print out so we can 
cross check the _CRS.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to