On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:08:47PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote: >On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:26:59AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> >>: >>:-On [20050801 09:00], Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>:> I'll change it a little, but I don't really want to put sub-versions >>:> on the HTML pages because its yet another thing that would have to be >>:> tracked, and I don't want bumping a subversion to become a chore. >>: >>:Given the changes for 1.2, it is quite worthwhile, no? Some of these fixes >>:are real PITAs for users. >>: >>:But hey, it's your baby. :P >>: >>:-- >>:Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono >> >> Yah, yah, you're right. Just another thing that's going to get out of >> date over time, though. But it is important information. >> >> -Matt > >I've been bitten looking at cvsweb DragonFly_Stable and thinking it was >the current stable tag. Where is the best place to look for definitions >of the tags? And will obsolete tags ever be removed from cvsweb or src?
Might I suggest, create http://www.dragonflybsd.org/main/release.old.cgi as an index to obsolete release pages, http://www.dragonflybsd.org/main/release.cgi as a symlink to the present release page, http://www.dragonflybsd.org/main/release1_2.cgi The idea being, people would have a single non-changing point of reference for the newest tags, "release.cgi". Something seems inherently wrong with requiring users to read http://dragonflybsd.org/ and follow the current link to the present release page (which may have been replaced like http://www.dragonflybsd.org/main/release1_0.cgi) so they can find a current description. // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <IXOYE>< http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
