On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:14:07 +0200 "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26.03.2006, at 04:00, Dragronfly Kernel List User wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ you might want > to insert $realname here, or at least spell "DragonFly" correctly... > Sorry about that, fixed now (more or less). :) ... > > How can you state that patches are commited without thorough > testing? First of all you don't know how much testing the developers > actually do before committing the patch. And secondly, patches which > go to -release are security and bug fixes ONLY. We don't add > features to -release like freebsd does on -stable. You really need > to read documentation before making such claims. I was making no claim, I was simply making an observation based on my perception of the fast speed that some patches are committed. You are right though, I should read the documentation more thoroughly and will do so. Not sure why the tenor of your reply is so angry and defensive. I asked questions to further my knowledge and not to criticize Dragonfly or its developers. > ... > > > If this is in fact the way DF RELEASE releases come out, I fail to > > see why a 1.6.2 would be "safer" than the official 1.6.0 (or for > > that matter > > 1.4.3 vs. 1.40). > > It is not, in fact. > > > I'm simply trying to plan for the best release to install on the > > production server. > > Always the latest release. > > ... Here I'm confused again. Do you mean the latest full release (1.4.0) or the latest tag (1.4.3)? Thank you.
