On 2006-08-07, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current UFS code is complicated, since it didn't have a separation > between namespace locking and content locking. When you kill the whole > relocking dance, it becomes much simpler. Noone wants to really clean > the UFS locking though, because the code base is extremely complicated.
Okay, I'm beginning to see the light. I slowly recognize what a fine grained locking scheme in the namecache could and should provide. Csaba
