Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
I really really hope NetBSD doesn't end up with similarly complex SMP, because that could really kill it, with a minor fraction of FreeBSD's developer resources and an onus to continue supporting many architectures.
Well, it appears that at least for userland they're moving from the complex M:N threading model using scheduler activations to a 1:1 model. Also, there's talk about interrupt handler threads, replacing SPLs, etc, more in the DragonFly direction of SMP.
Cheers,
--
Thomas E. Spanjaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
