Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Matt - how firm are you on calling the next release 2.0? A major version
:number increment usually has a major change with it, and the new
:filesystem would make sense to match that.
:
:We'll get increased attention by going to a 2.0 release, just by virtue of
:the number, and I'd like to take advantage of that by being able to talk
:up a new filesystem (and whatever other achievements we have at that
:point).
I'm not firm on calling it 2.0. I'm thinking we shouldn't call it 2.0.
I don't like going to two digits on 1.x either though, but we may have
to.
call it 1.A :) I'm feeling uneasy with the 2.0 jump as well, just my 0.02 CHF -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
