Ok, I uploaded a patch (it is against HEAD from Oct 26) here [1]. >From the notes I wrote, the strategy I was using was like this (for porting one netgraph module at a time): - create module directory under sys/netgraph7/ - git-mv module files into direrectory - copy Makefile from old netgraph into dir - edit sys/netgraph7/Makefile - edit etc/mtree/BSD.include - edit include/Makefile - edit sys/conf/files - edit #include's on the module code - edit lib/libnetgraph/debug.c (add #includes and COOKIE) - edit kernconf [2] and test
[1] http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~nant/wip/netgraph7.diff.bz2 [2] http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~nant/wip/NETGRAPH7.VKERNEL Cheers, Nuno On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > After Matt imported netgraph7, I worked a bit on it to make it compile > and work. But this effort has been interrupted by real job so I tend > to work on it on and off. > > Let me prepare a patch with what I have, and I will upload it for you to see. > > Cheers, > Nuno > > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Dennis Melentyev > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> 2008/12/6 Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Hi. >>> >>> Dennis Melentyev wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry for bringing back quite old topic, but now it's the time I am >>>> interested in mpd :) >>>> >>>> Today I just compiled (but not tested) libpdel-0.5.3 (just a bunch of >>>> #ifdefs, GET_COOKIE() -> fcookie define, NG_HOOKLEN and NG_PATHLEN >>>> macros). >>>> >>>> The problem with mpd4.4.1 is much more complex for me: I'm not that >>>> experienced with make to re-create bsd.ports.mk and friends. Also, I'm >>>> not aware of actual status of DFBSD's netgraph. >>>> >>>> Could it be a good day to revisit mpd-on-DragonFly issue? >>> >>> As good as any other. The main question is still the state of netgraph in >>> DF. Last time I have looked, it was in state of FreeBSD4. Now I can see some >>> netgraph7 directory in DF CVS, but I have no idea about it's status. >>> >>> mpd4.4.1 is the latest mpd version supporting FreeBSD4 in it's netgraph >>> state. Now it is legacy and I have no wish to continue development of that >>> branch. Present mpd5.2 version is completely superior and this is that front >>> line to which you should orient yourself. Mpd5 is widely tunes itself to the >>> system capabilities to support all FreeBSD versions starting from 5.x. To >>> clean the code some of critical FreeBSD 4.x tunings (for example, NG_NODESIZ >>> of 16 bytes support) were removed. But even without this, it still would be >>> practically inoperable now due to many other problems in that old netgraph >>> code, which are now fixed in new versions. >> >> Ok, that's fair. I will look at mpd5/netgraph on DFLY some night. >> Hope, I would be able to do something. >> >>> >>>> What can I provide: >>>> 1. Access to DFBSD system (home server, semi-production :) ) and >>>> FreeBSD mpd server (router at work, serious production) >>>> 2. Testing, some C coding (well, I'm short of DFBSD kernel experience, >>>> but should not be a big problem to grep sources) >>>> 3. Beer/Juice/Vodka/Borjomi (in Kiev, via the train, airmail, etc). :) >>> >>> Sorry, but with my work for FreeBSD I have no spare time to actively >>> maintain one more system. If somebody going to finish DF netgraph update to >>> the recent FreeBSD state, started by Matthew Dillon, and will maintain it >>> further, I will help him with mpd support and my netgraph knowledge. >> >> That's all ok. But probably I would need your advises and clues. Let's >> see if I would be able to work on it (the time limits mostly). >> >> -- >> Dennis Melentyev >> >
