On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Samuel J. Greear <s...@evilcode.net> wrote: > We have quite a few kprintf's in the kernel that do not necessarily > report error conditions, they are purely informational and highlight > odd or rare cases that often the end-user of the operating system > really doesn't need to know about. This has been discussed quite a few > times on IRC. > > I would like to put these under a sysctl like kern.developer and wrap > them in a function like dkprintf unless anyone has any major > objections. (I'm open to suggestions on the naming). > > Sam >
Would ktr(4) be of good use? Nuno
