Hi Pratyush,

It didn't apply cleanly in master:

Patching file usr.bin/top/m_dragonfly.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 63.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 85.
Hunk #3 failed at 98.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 178 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #5 failed at 198.
Hunk #6 failed at 210.
Hunk #7 failed at 222.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 348 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #9 failed at 390.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 473 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 554 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 560 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 606 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 617 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 670 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #16 failed at 747.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 797 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1077 (offset 31 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1076 (offset -4 lines).
6 out of 19 hunks failed--saving rejects to usr.bin/top/m_dragonfly.c.rej
done

Can you please fix it?

Cheers,
Antonio Huete

2011/10/14 Pratyush Kshirsagar <[email protected]>

> Hello,
> Here is the top io patch attached.
> This patch is just for testing purpose.
> I have made some changes to PRES print and sorting stuff.
> As, I was testing this on my old system, cause its graphical and gives me
> some good read and write results while fire-fox is running.
> I talked on IRC and Alex told me that the IVCSW  (In voluntary context
> switches) values are not stored properly but on my system I always see the
> IVCSW values zero both with the values from the struct kp_ru and kp_cru i.e.
> I tried to check the values of process resource usage and childs resource
> usage and the IVCSW is allways zero. May be their are no involuntary context
> switches on my system, may be the processes are kind enough to utilise cpu
> in bounds.
> Also, I added a function to sort the reads which is not sorting the
> processes properly, although the logic is same the way with other sort
> ORDERKEY's.
>
> Please test this patch with the top -m io command and give me some
> suggestions on it.
>
> Note: This patch is just to get some feedback. The only things missing in
> this patch is sorting the output depending on write, total io, vcsw, ivcsw
> and faults.
>
> - Pratyush Kshirsagar.
>
  • top io patch Pratyush Kshirsagar
    • Re: top io patch Antonio Huete Jimenez

Reply via email to