On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, John Marino <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1) Agreement on the EOL date (or Release if it's pegged to a release) I'd rather peg to a release; I'd assume we'd want to truncate i386 at the time of a release, instead of somewhere between two releases. Since release dates can be a little floaty, that's easier to manage. > 2) A declaration of which road map will be used (method #1 or #2) I don't know what the usage ratio of i386-only machines is at this point; I'd feel more confident if I knew the impact, but there's no way to find that out. #2 (Or Sam's #3) appeals to me just because I've wanted something that could be called a long-term support release for a while. A disadvantage of x86_64 is no linuxlator support, but keeping i386 around isn't going to solve that problem.
