On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:01:57PM +0200, Just a Normal Person wrote: > Unluckily this reply was what I expected and it doesn't really address > anything in my opinion. > I am sorry, though, as I quite liked DragonFly back in the day and I > feel decisions as short-sighted as these seriously harm the project. > Anyway, good luck to the people in charge of this project - it's too > evident they really need it.
I think it's time to clarify a few things. - No decision has been made to kill i386 - There are no people "in charge" of this kind of decision; as long as there are volonteers willing to make sure DragonFly runs on 32-bit machines and build ISO images, new i386 releases will keep coming. I can see the i386 architecture receiving less and less attention as time goes by and its number of users dwindle but there's no reason to kill it prematurely. -- Francois Tigeot
