> 1. Is that any discussion are already talking about desiging I/O, Mem in JJOS? What
>I mean is that,
> Which Parts of Objects Should be implememted By C, Which Parts of Objects Should
>be
> implememted By Java ?
We want to do as much as possible in Java; the specifics are under
discussion on this list; see the thread "alternative approach to memory
classes" for the issues.
> 2. Should Everything use Java to Implement ? or For Hardware Driver, we use C.
>Except Driver, We use Java ?
Java is used to implement "as much as possible." Practically,
that means the kernel and the JVM are written in native code; drivers are
written in Java using native method calls for access to the hardware.
> 3. Is that any works has been started to due with Graphics Adaptor ?
Well, JJOS runs in text mode :) JM is going to write up memory
access classes as soon as the problems raised by question #1 are decided.
> 4. Any standard of Native Implementation of Java in JJOS ?
Currently, no. Eventually, I plan on support JNI.
-_Quinn
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
