> Hm, will we use FAT as the Basic FS of JJOS ? Since I would like to
> have a Journal FS for JJOS rather than a FAT.
FAT has the virtue of absurd simplicity, which is important when
implementing an FS from scratch in a language, that, AFAIK, has never been
used for a FS before. I'd imagine we're going to a VFS-style system when
all the dust clears.
-_Quinn
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
- [JOS-Kernel] File System Regier Avery J
- Re: [JOS-Kernel] File System Johan Rydberg
- Re: [JOS-Kernel] File System Hilary Cheng
- RE: [JOS-Kernel] File System Todd L. Miller
- RE: [JOS-Kernel] File System Regier Avery J
