>     Hm, will we use FAT as the Basic FS of JJOS ? Since I would like to
> have a Journal FS for JJOS rather than a FAT.

        FAT has the virtue of absurd simplicity, which is important when
implementing an FS from scratch in a language, that, AFAIK, has never been
used for a FS before.  I'd imagine we're going to a VFS-style system when
all the dust clears.

-_Quinn



_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

Reply via email to