Hi ,
For the Right Now, I am implementing the PCI Driver Code. If someone
like to have a
look, I can send them my current code.
Regards,
Hilary
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JOS-Kernel] New JEPS release, multiple interfaces and routing.
>
> Am working on some foundation for network- and other cards.
> I'm using a laptop, so I need PCI and PCMCIA support, on which I'm working
> on right now. Progress is slow, because of the CVS code I have to compile
> (and adjust) over and over again anytime there is an update(Sigh...).
> Also the absence of string concatenation is (or was... don't know if it
has
> been solved yet..) a big problem.
>
> I hope to be of assistance for making ne2000 code for the native builds.
>
> PS. If we have a poll for netboot/grub., I have to vote for GRUB !!!
> PPS. Why has the capitalization of the classnames been altered recently ?
> Why not just stick with the 'normal' JAVA naming style
> "java.package.ClassName" instead of "java.package.classname" ?
>
>
> Greetz,
>
> Fushion
>
>
>
>
> Ranieri Argentini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> udelft.nl> cc:
> Sent by: Subject:
[JOS-Kernel] New JEPS release,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple interfaces and
routing.
>
>
> 15-01-00 02:29 PM
> Please respond to
> kernel
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I just put up the current JEPS code.
>
> It includes a number of improvements in the IP and ARP category as well as
> incipient error signalling through exceptions (really needed that!).
Please
> check it out :)
> Plans for the immidiate future are mainly fragmentation and reassembly as
> they are a fundamental part of the IP protocol.
>
> I suppose i could move JEPS development onto the CVS in order to be able
to
> share access with ppl on a more dynamic basis. What do you guys think? How
> would i go about in doing this?
>
> How's the progress on native ne2000 drivers coming along? Is anyone
> bothering with it yet?
> If we get them even half working i'm willing to try the port, just to see
> if it works.
>
> I have a good feeling about this .. It might not end up to be the fastest
> stack in the block, but i think we are going to be able to make it
> compliant to all the internet host requirements eventually.
>
> Ranieri Argentini
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
