On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:46 AM, David Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> Since I think we are trying to calm down the random gpu hacker commits to >> fedora kernel, I said I'd let you guys do all the hard work, > > Not exactly, but OK. > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux/commit/?h=qxl-fedora-queue&id=db8edc33193879f39c1b52521e20f4d6eb4e9858 > > OK. I'll probably try and track down which sha1s those commits map to > at some point, but thanks for pulling them together in a single patch.
So I think they map to: drm/qxl: prefer the monitor config resolution (b080742393e2c19c603ccd651f10d58b32455749) drm/qxl: remove unnecessary check (a40a60d912a101e8dfb08ee15eb02430aaf6112b) drm/qxl: fix disabling extra monitors from client (5cab51cb3381157e652bb85e3e87adb44497c672) qxl: avoid an oops in the deferred io code. (cc87509d87696d7cd393882f5dedea01e03e41a9) drm/qxl: support 64bit surface bar (35541782dcc1e502d1864075eded7b3bb23b7268) qxl: add a connector property to denote hotplug should rescan modes. (4695b03970df378dcb93fe3e7158381f1e980fa2) >> I'd like to get that patch into as many fedora's as possible, it seems to >> apply okay on 3.11 and 3.12 for me, >> >> They are all backports from drm-next that I wasn't game to stable yet but I >> think we'd like in Fedora as they avoid some issues, they are also mostly in >> <redacted> enterprise. > > Is that the drm-next that's headed into 3.13 or 3.14? Merge window is > open right now, so it's not clear to me. And I think those are all headed into 3.13, right? josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
