On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Steve Dickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08/26/2014 01:47 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 08/26/2014 01:30 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Steve Dickson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> When build kernel from the source rpm I >>>> get the following depmod failure: >>>> >>>> + depmod -b . -aeF ./System.map 3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64 >>>> + '[' -s depmod.out ']' >>>> + echo 'Depmod failure' >>>> Depmod failure >>>> + cat depmod.out >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_new_lockspace >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_unlock >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_release_lockspace >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_unlock >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_get >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_lock >>>> depmod: WARNING: >>>> /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko >>>> needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_lock >>>> + exit 1 >>>> >>>> What needs to happen to get this fixed? Should I open up a bz or >>>> open up a ticket somewhere? Please tell me where to go... nicely! ;-) >>> >>> Didn't we discuss all of this in #fedora-kernel yesterday? Did the >>> advice we gave there not work, or? >> Yes.. Your advice was to use 'fedpkg local' which does indeed work but >> it also builds a bunch of rpms I don't need or use, like debug kernels. >> >> When I rpmbuild from a srpm I use the following flags >> --without extra --without tools --without debug --without perf --without >> headers >> >> which greatly decrease the compiling time... from 70mins to 30mins >> depending on the machine... >> >> Now if I can set those flags in the fedpkg local build... Then >> I'm good to go... > > Also, I can use the resulting source tree for debugging... (aka > recompile modules after modifying the code)
So really, you don't want RPMs. You want a local exploded source tree you can use for build and development. Correct? josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
