From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1387#note_680599158
There is a long run-on sentence here. Can we break it up? One suggestion (starting at 'Keeping the process......upstream merges only'): "" Rebasing from time to time, helps reduce the clutter of the extra changes on top of upstream and future merge conflicts. This periodic rebase addresses the needs of the Fedora community's desire to separate upstream from Fedora specific changes, helps keep it clear what patches changed in the final form upstream, and what a Fedora specific patch looks like currently as opposed to split across various conflict patches. While rebasing has a negative effect on developer contribution, we believe saving the rebase for the end of release cycle allows for minimal developer contribution disruption while gaining the above advantages. This process is open to feedback for improvements. "" The spirit of the above is to lay out our reasons for performing a developer impacting rebase. And then acknowledging that we understand this negatively impacts developers. Followed by our desire to continue to evolve this process. Feel free to re-word/write my suggestion. :-) Thoughts? _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
