On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:56:21PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: <snip> > > Heh, after talking with jforbes about it this is probably just as fast > (sorry for the cut-and-paste)
Yep, this for sure will work too :), but it looks like the first config is processed twice, which is IMHO not necessary. > > diff --git a/redhat/configs/process_configs.sh > b/redhat/configs/process_configs.sh > index 2ee4037ad4fc..27372afc270a 100755 > --- a/redhat/configs/process_configs.sh > +++ b/redhat/configs/process_configs.sh > @@ -304,6 +304,10 @@ function process_configs() > count=0 > for cfg in "$SCRIPT_DIR/${PACKAGE_NAME}${KVERREL}${SUBARCH}"*.config > do > + if [ "$count" -eq 0 ]; then > + # do the first one by itself so that tools are built > + process_config "$cfg" "$count" > + fi > process_config "$cfg" "$count" & > waitpids[${count}]=$! > ((count++)) > > Test build in progress now. > > P. <snip> -- Frantisek Hrbata _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure