From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1346758298
But also, if the kernel builds aren't 100% in lock-step, you could have a technically "newer" kernel in the latest release with a lower NVR than the prior release, because you merged several fixes in one build, and went from -1.releaseX+1 to -2.releaseX+1, while in releaseX, you did multiple builds to get the same fixes in, and went from -1.releaseX to -5.releaseX. Or something. So the 100/200/300 still has some merit w/current Fedora versions and will protect us from the fc99 to fc100 bump. :) (But does have the caveat of making it possible that -301.fc38 can be upgraded to from -299.fc37, which might actually be an overall kernel version downgrade, looking strictly at upstream and fixes, wheeeeeee -- however, that's a pretty slim chance I think, given the development model). _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
