From: Philipp Rudo on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2917#note_1789653760
Hi Emanuele, your implementation is different to what I originally suggested. But I must admit that your implementation is better. With my suggestion it would have been hard to get a reasonable name for the final addon. What I don't understand is why you are building the exact same set of addons for every kernel without adding a .uname section. The way I see it we either ship one set of addons for every arch/variant. But then it would be better to have a separate noarch rpm so we don't need to rebuild it over and over again. Or we want to be able to ship arch/variant-specific addons. But then you need to set the .uname section and a way to tell uki_addon.py to build addons only for certain archs/variants. Personally I would again simply copy what is done for the kernel configs and re-use the directory structure there (if we choose to go this way). -- _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
