On 14-09-17 07:51 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:08 PM, nick <xerofo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 14-09-17 07:20 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > <snip> >>> anyway, it's time for coffee. >>> >>> rday >>> >> Rday and others, >> That's not what I wanted I was trying to improve my rep after getting banned >> from vger.org and now it seems >> I can't even get a patch right. In addition I was trying to do check patch >> because it was easier for me >> due to not understanding some parts of the code. >> Nick >> > > try to understand the code first. if you do not understand the code > how do you know that your patch will not break any part of the logic . > ok , by adding blank lines you will not break the logic. > but yesterday in your other patch you removed an error message . may i > ask why did you think that error message is not required ? > > thanks > sudip > >> _______________________________________________ >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies I thought that the return statement of NULL to a caller was enough. Nick
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
