Since I knew that Linux kernel didn't accept the pax/grsecurity , but wrote its own implement, and some linux developers do not have sense of security, I think linux security will be a problem in the future. - mudongliang
2015-08-18 21:45 GMT+08:00 Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammil...@gmail.com> : > Why? That's what the vast majority of the kernel is written in (besides > assembler, but what I'm looking for isn't a way to write safe assembler). > Plus, tons of people in the kernel development community *must* have some > concern or interest in security. I don't care if the kernel is written in > C, but I sure would like my kernel module to be safer. If I can get it I > don't care what language it's in-it just has to work and *be secure*. > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: >> >> > Ok- so I know that C is the defacto standard for kernel >> > development... >> >> and that's probably where you should have stopped typing. :-) >> >> rday >> >> -- >> >> ======================================================================== >> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA >> http://crashcourse.ca >> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday >> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday >> ======================================================================== >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > >
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies