Martin Galvan <[email protected]> writes: > I'm writing a kernel module, and am trying to implement some > exception-handling mechanism so that the system won't oops/panic if my > module does e.g. a NULL dereference.
Why don't you test your pointer for NULL instead? Sounds like a hell of a lot simpler solution to me. But I'm probably missing something as usual... Bjørn _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
