On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:39:37AM +0000, Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo wrote:
> >> Hi all, this is my first post in this mailing list... I hope to find an 
> >> answer. I've post the question in stackoverflow with the same tittle with 
> >> no answers yet. Since then, I've been able to reduce the demo kernel 
> >> module to minimum in order to show but I see. The minimum kernel module 
> >> code is attached at the end.
> >> 
> >> My kernel module was working ok up to kernel 5.10.x. My kernel module adds 
> >> a layer above the cdc-acm class driver to use all the infrastructure this 
> >> driver because the hardware it controls has a ttyACMx device. The minimum 
> >> kernel module code attached shows how I open the ttyACMx device and try to 
> >> set the baudrate. Once the device is opened I use the unlocked_ioctl 
> >> function with TCSETS to set the new device properties. 
> >> 
> >>                ret = fd->f_op->unlocked_ioctl(fd, TCSETS, (unsigned long 
> >>int) &newtio);
> 
> >Ick, why do all of this from the kernel and not just do it from
> >userspace?
> >
> >Do you have a pointer to the source of your whole module so we can help
> >with solving the root problem and not mess with this specific
> >implementation which is not the correct thing to do at all.
> 
> Hi Greg!
> 
> Well, I can summarize as technological debt :( 
> I have to maintain an old code and I've been succesful until now with
> minimal changes... Is there no way to overcome this?

There might be, again, do you have a pointer to your full source for the
module?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Reply via email to