Hi, Fabio, I haven't ever written Kbuild rules but as far as I understand that message "Symbol: STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] [is] Visible if: ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] && ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX [=n]" seems to say that we can see and enable/disable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if and only if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set to "yes" AND ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX is set to "no".
Is it me that I'm misunderstanding the above-mentioned message from "make menuconfig"? Yes I select or set options using make menuconfig. But this CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX was not settable in the menuconfig.(only appear in the search) That’s why I set ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX to =n. This ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX was not settable through menuconfig either. If the visibility condition is not met, the config menu for that config variable does not appear in the menuconfig window. (The menu is not visible in the specified location, you can check it yourself. As you said, some menus become selectable when the condition is met and is meaningful) Chan From: FMDF <fmdefrance...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2022 7:24 PM To: Chan Kim <c...@etri.re.kr> Cc: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org> Subject: Re: arm64 code looking for variable rodata_enabled when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX = n On Fri, 18 Mar 2022, 07:04 Chan Kim, <c...@etri.re.kr <mailto:c...@etri.re.kr> > wrote: Hello all, This is what I see when I search “KERNEL_RWX” during “make menuconfig” for arm64 kernel(5-10.0-rc5). The Kconfig file says CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is for setting text and rodata read-only. Symbol: ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX [=n] Type : bool Defined at arch/Kconfig:928 Symbol: ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT [=n] Type : bool Defined at arch/Kconfig:931 Symbol: STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] Type : bool Defined at arch/Kconfig:937 Prompt: Make kernel text and rodata read-only Depends on: ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] Visible if: ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] && ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX [=n] Location: (1) -> General architecture-dependent options I wanted to try setting STRICT_KERNEL_RWX to =n. It says this option is visible when ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX is =y which is now =n. Now I'm a bit confused... why do you say that "It says this option is visible when ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX is =y"? I haven't ever written Kbuild rules but as far as I understand that message "Symbol: STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] [is] Visible if: ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX [=y] && ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX [=n]" seems to say that we can see and enable/disable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if and only if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set to "yes" AND ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX is set to "no". Is it me that I'm misunderstanding the above-mentioned message from "make menuconfig"? So I modified to ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX=y in arch/Kconfig line 928. (BTW, is it correct to modify this Kconfig file directly? I’m not sure at the moment) For sure, I'd never do this. Why don't you simply use make menuconfig for enabling/disabling options? Options are strictly interrelated and largely depend on others. Why do you want to bypass dependency checks? Then I could see the STRICT_KERNEL_RWX menu in the menuconfig and I set it to =n as I wanted. But when I build the kernel, I see this errors. Again, if it's not me that I'm missing something, the following errors are simply explained by your weird way to enable/disable options. Please correct me if I didn't get something that you wrote (I'm very tired now after a long night staying awoke :)) Regards, Fabio M. De Francesco ckim@ckim-ubuntu:~/ProjX/LinuxDevDrv/kernel-release-RD-INFRA-2020.11.30$ <mailto:ckim@ckim-ubuntu:~/ProjX/LinuxDevDrv/kernel-release-RD-INFRA-2020.11.30$> makeit CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/generated/compile.h CC arch/arm64/mm/mmu.o arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'parse_rodata': arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:595:28: error: 'rodata_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function) 595 | int ret = strtobool(arg, &rodata_enabled); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:595:28: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'map_entry_trampoline': arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:614:18: error: 'rodata_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function) 614 | pgprot_t prot = rodata_enabled ? PAGE_KERNEL_ROX : PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'map_kernel': arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:669:23: error: 'rodata_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function) 669 | pgprot_t text_prot = rodata_enabled ? PAGE_KERNEL_ROX : PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: arch/arm64/mm/mmu.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/arm64/mm] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:1799: arch/arm64] Error 2 variable “rodata_enabled” is defined in init/main.c as below. #if defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) bool rodata_enabled __ro_after_init = true; static int __init set_debug_rodata(char *str) { return strtobool(str, &rodata_enabled); } __setup("rodata=", set_debug_rodata); #endif But now since CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=n, it is not defined here(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=n too). and arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c code is still using `rodata_enabled`. Is this a bug of the code? Or am I missing something? I can modify init/main.c and include/linux/init.h so that this rodata_enabled and related functions be defined regardless of these CONFIG values and make the errors go away, but I’m curious if this a kind of kernel bug raising compiler error. Any comment will be really appreciated. Thank you! Chan Kim _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org <mailto:Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
