On 7/7/07, pradeep singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/7/07, Rajat Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > Huh? So something like following is allowed? Yes AFAICT. > > preempt_disable(); > udelay(5); > preempt_enable(); > > ????? What is wrong with this code?
nothing.
This should work fine. udelay is fine enough i guess. It should be a prob if it is msleep(n) or usleep(n). isn't it?
Yes.
yes/no?
Yes.
Did i miss something?
No. Thanks, Nish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
