when examining the remaining traces of the deprecated
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro in structures, i'm used to seeing the common
replacement of:
struct vt_spawn_console vt_spawn_con = {
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vt_spawn_con.lock),
.pid = NULL,
.sig = 0,
};
you know -- the newer form of the __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro, which
takes the name of the lock for debugging purposes. but i'm a bit
confused by this from drivers/char/random.c:
static struct entropy_store input_pool = {
.poolinfo = &poolinfo_table[0],
.name = "input",
.limit = 1,
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&input_pool.lock),
.pool = input_pool_data
};
static struct entropy_store blocking_pool = {
.poolinfo = &poolinfo_table[1],
.name = "blocking",
.limit = 1,
.pull = &input_pool,
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&blocking_pool.lock),
.pool = blocking_pool_data
};
um ... what's with the "&" as a prefix on the lock name? should
that be there? it's not like you're supposed to be taking the address
of anything, is it? i'm confused.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
