read the man pages for patch and -R seems to be the rescuer.

~amit

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:29 PM, amit mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build linux kernel for version 2.6.24 on a machine running
> suse.
> so i downloaded the kernel soruces and patches from :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/<ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.26.tar.bz2>
>
> I've downloaded following two compressed files:
> linux-2.6.24.tar.bz2
> patch-2.6.24.bz2
>
> After uncompressing and making symlink as
> ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.24 /usr/src/linux
>
> I gave a dry run for patches as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] cd /usr/src/linux
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux ] # bzip2 -dc /usr/src/patch-2.6.24.bz2 | 
> patch
> -p1 --dry-run
> patching file .gitignore
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
>
> Seems that it found already applied patches, so what should i provide as
> answer to
> the above querry(Assume -R? [n] ) , i gave "Y" as answer and then again
> there was
> similar question for several other files . so is there any way to be able
> to overwrite the already applied
> patches non interactively(i mean without answering the same question for
> other files as well) ?
>
> ~amit
>
>
>
> --
> "Everyone has a photographic memory. Some people just don't have film."
>
> — Mel Brooks
>



-- 
"Everyone has a photographic memory. Some people just don't have film."

— Mel Brooks

Reply via email to