On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Henrik Austad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 05:22:50 Manish Katiyar wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi! Before you read on: be very aware that I'm not a git-expert. If you really > want to have the 'correct' answer, send the question to [email protected] > or > ask at #...@freenode > >> I have a simple question wrt git. After making few commits in my local >> git branch, let's say that I need to rework a patch and resend it >> again. In this is it possible to make only the necessary changes in >> the required commit and create a patch out of the previous and the new >> commit and resend ? > > My gut reaction is: Use branches :) > > >> What I do currently is : >> >> a) Save the new changed file >> b) Revert the commit >> c) Overwrite the file with the changed file >> d) Make the *rework* changes >> e)Make a new commit it and send as a patch. > > You can do this several ways. One way, if you need to do a lot of reworking on > a particular commit, and you do not want to change the order of the commits: > git checkout -b tmp_branch target_commit_id > <do you stuff> > git add -u > git commit --amend (to squash the commit on top of the original) > git merge master
Thanks a lot Henrik, I will try these steps, once I am at home and let you know if it solves my problem. Thanks - Manish > > or, if you do not really care for the order of the commits, just the commits > themself, have a look at git rebase --interactive > >> Is there any better/smarter way of doing this ? > > Did this answer your question? > >> Thanks - >> Manish > > -- > Henrik > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
