I mean RAM based.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:50 PM, sahlot arvind <asah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Try writing memory based file system.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Shyam Burkule <shyam.burk...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg, Thanks for your reply.
>>
>>
>> Actually I am new to file system, I did work in memory management of Linux
>> kernel. My concern is to understand file system, block architecture etc. I
>> started reading, but wanted to do some implementation.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Shyam
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Greg Freemyer 
>> <greg.freem...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Shyam Burkule <shyam.burk...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello All,
>>> >
>>> > Can you provide me with some project idea in file system that help to
>>> > understand file system stack.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >   Shyam
>>>
>>> If you don't care if it gets accepted by mainline, then backporting
>>> the ext4 online defragger to ext3/ext2 seems to me like an interesting
>>> project.  Those are too mature I think to have a something as big a
>>> online defragger accepted.  You might get a distro or two to pick up a
>>> patch like that add in during their packaging process.
>>>
>>> The ext4 patch is not yet in mainline, so you can see exactly what
>>> changes are needed for it to work with ext4.
>>>
>>> http://markmail.org/message/iv4gisf7jis4epuk
>>>
>>> It also looks like most of Akira Fujita's kernel posts have primarily
>>> related to this one patchset, so you can also sort of see how the
>>> patchset evolved over the course of the last year.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=Akira+Fujita#query:Akira%20Fujita%20from%3A%22Akira%20Fujita%22+page:1+state:facets
>>>
>>> Greg
>>> --
>>> Greg Freemyer
>>> Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
>>> First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
>>> http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf
>>>
>>> The Norcross Group
>>> The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
>>> http://www.norcrossgroup.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to