Hello all, I've seen that the compilation of certain programs (such as user/mount) fails with kernel 2.6 because they are suitable for kernel 2.0. A solution is to use Busybox which provides a large set of functionalities. Should I use 'Busybox/init' instead of 'user/init'? Does 'user/init' and 'user/sh' entirely compatible with kernel 2.6? Thanks in advance for your answers. Regards.
-- Cortus S.A., Montpellier email: [email protected] http://www.cortus.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [email protected] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
