ok, part of the mystery is solved and i'm just being an idiot:

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   and this is also weird:
>
> (gdb) p loops_per_jiffy
> $16 = 4096
>
> huh?  that value is way too low for this system.  on my old 32-bit
> system, that value would be around 2 million or so.

  in fact, that's exactly the right value based on this snippet from
init/main.c:

  unsigned long loops_per_jiffy = (1<<12);

which is, of course, 4096.

  but i still don't know why i can't print the changing value of
jiffies if i clear the cache with:

  (gdb) core-file /proc/kcore

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar...@nl.linux.org
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

Reply via email to