Hi all,
In include/linux/debugfs.h there is a comment: /* * We do not return NULL from these functions if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not enabled * so users have a chance to detect if there was a real error or not. We don't * want to duplicate the design decision mistakes of procfs and devfs again. */ If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not enabled then all debugfs functions return -ENODEV. However, implementations doesn't check return codes with IS_ERR(), but with (ret == NULL). Is this done exactly to "spoof" drivers and make them think that there is a debugfs? Then the full cycle of debugfs will be dummy. AFAIU, this is done to make drivers differ e.g. OOM situations (this is critical one) and no debugfs (not critical). Is it correct? Thanks, -- Vasiliy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar...@nl.linux.org Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
