So the idea has already been announced. It is better to send a patch with the suggested "fix" for list stuff. No? :)
Thanks On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:53 PM, piyush moghe <pmker...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am also interested. > > Regards, > Piyush > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Kaspter Ju <nigh0st3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/21/2010 9:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> > >> > i can suggest some very specific cleanups people can work on if >> > they're bored. one related to lists: >> > >> > list_for_each() -> list_for_each_entry() calls >> > >> > that is, modifying the numerous (older-style) list_for_each() calls to >> > the more convenient list_for_each_entry() calls, something that can >> > be done little by little, a subsystem at a time. good way to jump >> > into kernel janitor work and get your name in the log. >> > >> > rday >> > >> Hi Robert, >> >> +1. :) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Kaspter >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with >> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar...@nl.linux.org >> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ >> > > -- Regards, Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar...@nl.linux.org Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
