Will try when I get home. This is going to be a huge pain if this doesn't get fixed in Ubuntu... :|
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:07 AM, mac9416 <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome, good find RSK! Chris, I don't have 10.10, so can you try this > and make sure it works for you too? > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Senthil Kumar_Rsk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The possible problem/restriction/bug in ubuntu 10.10 can be automounting > the > > usb drive without executable permission. > > Now that can be fixed by editing /etc/fstab : > > /dev/usbdrive /media/usb vfat umask=0222,auto,users,exec 0 0 > > Now onwards the USB will have the executable permission and I tested by > > running keryx(0.92) and works !!! > > > > But this is a manual solution , I suppose there would be some other > better > > solution which can make the auto mounting the usb drive with executable > > permission as like happens in ubuntu 10.04. > > > > Thanks, > > RSK > > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Senthil Kumar_Rsk < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Not only keryx any executable which is in USB flash drive not works in > >> Ubuntu 10.10. I too tested it. > >> But the same works fine if we copy it in hard disk drive or in ubuntu > >> 10.04. > >> I have posted a query in Ubuntu tracker/forums , lets see whether we get > >> any solution for that in mean time of development. > >> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/130341 > >> Thanks, > >> RSK > >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:48 AM, mac9416 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear Team, > >>> > >>> Quite a few users have reported that 0.92's Linux executable is not > >>> working with Ubuntu 10.10. It seems that > >>> > >>> 1) Ubuntu no longer allows executables to be run from flash drives, > >>> whether they are marked executable or not and > >>> 2) the 32-bit Linux binary is not playing nice with 64-bit installs. > >>> > >>> Problem 2 has been around for some time, and users could work around > >>> it by running Keryx from source. Problem 1 is new and prevents the > >>> solution to Problem 2. > >>> > >>> So far we have more questions than answers. I just wanted to let > >>> everyone know what is going on because it will likely effect 1.0 > >>> development -- it may not be possible for 1.0 to be a portable > >>> application. > >>> > >>> mac9416 > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekeryx> > >>> Post to : [email protected] > >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekeryx> > >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekeryx> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekeryx> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Chris Oliver http://excid3.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~keryx Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~keryx More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
