On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> - * in interrupt context :)
> + * Return true if we acquired the lock
> */
> -static int kexec_lock;
> +static inline bool kexec_trylock(void)
> +{
> + return !test_and_set_bit(0, &kexec_bitlock);
Nope. That needs to be an "unsigned long".
But more importantl, why not just make it a lock in the first place?
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kexec_lock);
#define kexec_trylock() spin_trylock(&kexec_lock)
#define kexec_unlock() spin_unlock(&kexec_lock)
and then you get it all right and clear and obvious.
Yeah, and I didn't check whether there is anything that is supposed to be
able to sleep. If there is, use a mutex instead of a spinlock, of course.
Linus
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
