On Tue, 26 Nov, at 01:57:55PM, Dave Young wrote: > +Users: > + Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
"Kexec" please. > +static ssize_t version_show(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) This is pretty strange indentation. Usually we prefer to line up the arguments like you've done elsewhere in this file. > +{ > + return sprintf(buf, "0x%04x\n", boot_params.hdr.version); > +} > + > +static struct kobj_attribute boot_params_version_attr = __ATTR_RO(version); > + > +static ssize_t boot_params_data_read(struct file *fp, struct kobject *kobj, > + struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, > + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count) > +{ > + memcpy(buf, (void *)&boot_params + off, count); > + return count; > +} Don't we need some checks here to ensure we don't read past the end of boot_params? > +static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) More whacky indentation. > +static int __init create_setup_data_node(struct kobject *parent, > + struct kobject **kobjp, int nr) Funky indentation. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec