在 2019年10月13日 11:54, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
> Dave Young <dyo...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 10/12/19 at 06:26am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Lianbo Jiang <liji...@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> When the crashkernel kernel command line option is specified, the
>>>> low 1MiB memory will always be reserved, which makes that the memory
>>>> allocated later won't fall into the low 1MiB area, thereby, it's not
>>>> necessary to create a backup region and also no need to copy the first
>>>> 640k content to a backup region.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the code related to the backup region can be safely removed,
>>>> so lets clean up.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <liji...@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> index eb651fbde92a..cc5774fc84c0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> @@ -173,8 +173,6 @@ void native_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs
>>>> *regs)
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
>>>>
>>>> -static unsigned long crash_zero_bytes;
>>>> -
>>>> static int get_nr_ram_ranges_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned int *nr_ranges = arg;
>>>> @@ -234,9 +232,15 @@ static int prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback(struct
>>>> resource *res, void *arg)
>>>> {
>>>> struct crash_mem *cmem = arg;
>>>>
>>>> - cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start;
>>>> - cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> - cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> + if (res->start >= SZ_1M) {
>>>> + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start;
>>>> + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> + cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> + } else if (res->end > SZ_1M) {
>>>> + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = SZ_1M;
>>>> + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> + cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> What is going on with this chunk? I can guess but this needs a clear
>>> comment.
>>
>> Indeed it needs some code comment, this is based on some offline
>> discussion. cat /proc/vmcore will give a warning because ioremap is
>> mapping the system ram.
>>
>> We pass the first 1M to kdump kernel in e820 as system ram so that 2nd
>> kernel can use the low 1M memory because for example the trampoline
>> code.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>
>>>> @@ -356,9 +337,12 @@ int crash_setup_memmap_entries(struct kimage *image,
>>>> struct boot_params *params)
>>>> memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct crash_memmap_data));
>>>> cmd.params = params;
>>>>
>>>> - /* Add first 640K segment */
>>>> - ei.addr = image->arch.backup_src_start;
>>>> - ei.size = image->arch.backup_src_sz;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Add the low memory range[0x1000, SZ_1M], skip
>>>> + * the first zero page.
>>>> + */
>>>> + ei.addr = PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> + ei.size = SZ_1M - PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> ei.type = E820_TYPE_RAM;
>>>> add_e820_entry(params, &ei);
>>>
>>> Likewise here. Why do we need a special case?
>>> Why the magic with PAGE_SIZE?
>>
>> Good catch, the zero page part is useless, I think no other special
>> reason, just assumed zero page is not usable, but it should be ok to
>> remove the special handling, just pass 0 - 1M is good enough.
>
> But if we have stopped special casing the low 1M. Why do we need a
> special case here at all?
>
Here, need to pass the low memory range to kdump kernel, which will guarantee
the availability of low memory in kdump kernel, otherwise, kdump kernel won't
use the low memory region.
> If you need the special case it is almost certainly wrong to say you
> have ram above 640KiB and below 1MiB. That is the legacy ROM and video
> MMIO area.
>
> There is a reason the original code said 640KiB.
>
Do you mean that the 640k region is good enough here instead of 1MiB?
Thanks.
Lianbo
> Eric
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
