Hi,

See below .

> On Nov 17, 2019, at 11:12 PM, Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.p...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Re-sending in plain text mode.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:39 PM Bhupesh Sharma <bhsha...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Changes since v3:
>> ----------------
>> - v3 can be seen here:
>>  
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DMarch_022534.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=tXNSuQSbZP03h4vwmeTiXu_9gUn9e_rY470TmwrNQSU&e=
>>  
>> - Added a new patch (via [PATCH 4/4]) which marks '--mem-usage' option as
>>  unsupported for arm64 architecture. With the newer arm64 kernels
>>  supporting 48-bit/52-bit VA address spaces and keeping a single
>>  binary for supporting the same, the address of
>>  kernel symbols like _stext, which could be earlier used to determine
>>  VA_BITS value, can no longer to determine whether VA_BITS is set to 48
>>  or 52 in the kernel space. Hence for now, it makes sense to mark
>>  '--mem-usage' option as unsupported for arm64 architecture until
>>  we have more clarity from arm64 kernel maintainers on how to manage
>>  the same in future kernel/makedumpfile versions.
>> 
>> Changes since v2:
>> ----------------
>> - v2 can be seen here:
>>  
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DFebruary_022456.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=Hd_PJi1aXdKh1jmODxHa_VFNy8HwvSYxCBH-wDitxkI&e=
>>  
>> - I missed some comments from Kazu sent on the LVA v1 patch when I sent
>>  out the v2. So, addressing them now in v3.
>> - Also added a patch that adds a tree-wide feature to read
>>  'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from vmcoreinfo (if available).
>> 
>> Changes since v1:
>> ----------------
>> - v1 was sent as two separate patches:
>>  
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DFebruary_022424.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=ZB2bTeP-9z7PVIUhtVjv0ao8wqWFJSOWTnH-kqj_LV8&e=
>>  
>>  (ARMv8.2-LPA)
>>  
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DFebruary_022425.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=OzCS7jUUiiB4YZPbD5xo1GRQtOtsgpHtnwQDV7AgiMs&e=
>>  
>>  (ARMv8.2-LVA)
>> - v2 combined the two in a single patchset and also addresses Kazu's
>>  review comments.
>> 
>> This patchset adds support for ARMv8.2 extensions in makedumpfile code.
>> I cover the following two cases with this patchset:
>> - 48-bit kernel VA + 52-bit PA (LPA)
>> - 52-bit kernel VA (LVA) + 52-bit PA (LPA)
>> - 48-bit kernel VA + 52-bit user-space VA (LVA)
>> - 52-bit kernel VA + 52-bit user-space VA (Full LVA)
>> 
>> This has been tested for the following user-cases:
>> 1. Creating a dumpfile using /proc/vmcore,
>> 2. Creating a dumpfile using /proc/kcore, and
>> 3. Post-processing a vmcore.
>> 
>> I have tested this patchset on the following platforms, with kernels
>> which support/do-not-support ARMv8.2 features:
>> 1. CPUs which don't support ARMv8.2 features, e.g. qualcomm-amberwing,
>>   ampere-osprey.
>> 2. Prototype models which support ARMv8.2 extensions (e.g. ARMv8 FVP
>>   simulation model).
>> 
>> Also a preparation patch has been added in this patchset which adds a
>> common feature for archs (except arm64, for which similar support is
>> added via subsequent patch) to retrieve 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from
>> vmcoreinfo (if available).
>> 
>> I recently posted two kernel patches (see [0] and [1]) which append
>> 'TCR_EL1.T1SZ' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo in the kernel
>> code, so that user-space code can benefit from the same.
>> 
>> This patchset ensures backward compatibility for kernel versions in
>> which 'TCR_EL1.T1SZ' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' are not available in
>> vmcoreinfo.
>> 
>> [0]. 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DNovember_023960.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=Aiwq36rzITwEmdA6KIDK54J-AWZKSMBcrGOG2sspXAg&e=
>>  
>> [1]. 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_kexec_2019-2DNovember_023962.html&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=q9nNMgIGrTZoTuSZ2xymuuXN2gqhXnfNlnRPRifV6CI&e=
>>  
>> 
>> Cc: John Donnelly <john.p.donne...@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Kazuhito Hagio <k-ha...@ab.jp.nec.com>
>> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> 
>> Bhupesh Sharma (4):
>>  tree-wide: Retrieve 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from vmcoreinfo (if available)
>>  makedumpfile/arm64: Add support for ARMv8.2-LPA (52-bit PA support)
>>  makedumpfile/arm64: Add support for ARMv8.2-LVA (52-bit kernel VA
>>    support)
>>  makedumpfile: Mark --mem-usage option unsupported for arm64
>> 
>> arch/arm.c     |   8 +-
>> arch/arm64.c   | 438 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> arch/ia64.c    |   7 +-
>> arch/ppc.c     |   8 +-
>> arch/ppc64.c   |  49 ++++---
>> arch/s390x.c   |  29 ++--
>> arch/sparc64.c |   9 +-
>> arch/x86.c     |  34 +++--
>> arch/x86_64.c  |  27 ++--
>> makedumpfile.c |   7 +
>> makedumpfile.h |   3 +-
>> 11 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --
> 
> Tested this patch-set on Marvell's TX2 platform on top
> commit(82e6cce2219a) of 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.code.sf.net_p_makedumpfile_code&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=Eg6LcBiLs9MlQf3jlvdRnuaQ-DODCNA9UKWnQgg9wX8&e=
>  
> (devel branch)
> 
> Tested-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushw...@marvell.com>
> 
> —p


   Hi ,
   
   I tested this on a Arm 8.1v platform with a 5.4.rc4 kernel and it fails :



kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt
kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt complete
kdump: saving vmcore
sadump: unsuppor     phys_start         phys_end       virt_start         
virt_end
LOAD[ 0]         92a80000         95040000 ffff800010080000 ffff800012640000
LOAD[ 1]         90000000         92000000 ffffc00010000000 ffffc00012000000
LOAD[ 2]         928c0000         dfe00000 ffffc000128c0000 ffffc0005fe00000
LOAD[ 3]         ffe00000         fffa0000 ffffc0007fe00000 ffffc0007ffa0000
LOAD[ 4]        880000000       1000000000 ffffc00800000000 ffffc00f80000000
LOAD[ 5]       8800000000       bff7010000 ffffc08780000000 ffffc0bf77010000
LOAD[ 6]       bff7040000       bff7740000 ffffc0bf77040000 ffffc0bf77740000
LOAD[ 7]       bff7770000       bff8020000 ffffc0bf77770000 ffffc0bf78020000
LOAD[ 8]       bff8050000       bff8070000 ffffc0bf78050000 ffffc0bf78070000
LOAD[ 9]       bff80d0000       bff8270000 ffffc0bf780d0000 ffffc0bf78270000
LOAD[10]       bff8280000       bff83d0000 ffffc0bf78280000 ffffc0bf783d0000
LOAD[11]       bff8870000       bffc1a0000 ffffc0bf78870000 ffffc0bf7c1a0000
LOAD[12]       bffc1c0000       bffc1d0000 ffffc0bf7c1c0000 ffffc0bf7c1d0000
LOAD[13]       bffe210000       bfffd10000 ffffc0bf7e210000 ffffc0bf7fd10000
LOAD[14]       bfffd40000       bfffd50000 ffffc0bf7fd40000 ffffc0bf7fd50000
LOAD[15]       bfffe00000       c000000000 ffffc0bf7fe00000 ffffc0bf80000000
Linux kdump
VMCOREINFO   :
  OSRELEASE=5.4.0-0
  PAGESIZE=65536
page_size    : 65536
  SYMBOL(init_uts_ns)=ffff800011ac5ca8
  SYMBOL(node_online_map)=ffff800011abd490
  SYMBOL(swapper_pg_dir)=ffff800011340000
  SYMBOL(_stext)=ffff800010081000
  SYMBOL(vmap_area_list)=ffff800011b89898
  SYMBOL(mem_section)=ffff00bf7be7e300
  LENGTH(mem_section)=64
  SIZE(mem_section)=16
  OFFSET(mem_section.section_mem_map)=0
  SIZE(page)=64
  SIZE(pglist_data)=6912
  SIZE(zone)=1920
  SIZE(free_area)=104
  SIZE(list_head)=16
  SIZE(nodemask_t)=8
  OFFSET(page.flags)=0
  OFFSET(page._refcount)=52
  OFFSET(page.mapping)=24
  OFFSET(page.lru)=8
  OFFSET(page._mapcount)=48
  OFFSET(page.private)=40
  OFFSET(page.compound_dtor)=16
  OFFSET(page.compound_order)=17
  OFFSET(page.compound_head)=8
  OFFSET(pglist_data.node_zones)=0
  OFFSET(pglist_data.nr_zones)=6176
  OFFSET(pglist_data.node_start_pfn)=6184
  OFFSET(pglist_data.node_spanned_pages)=6200
  OFFSET(pglist_data.node_id)=6208
  OFFSET(zone.free_area)=192
  OFFSET(zone.vm_stat)=1728
  OFFSET(zone.spanned_pages)=104
  OFFSET(free_area.free_list)=0
  OFFSET(list_head.next)=0
  OFFSET(list_head.prev)=8
  OFFSET(vmap_are14
  SYMBOL(logt_idx)=ffff800011ed7294
  SYMBOL(clear_idx)=ffff800011ed4ce0
 og)=16
  OFFSET(printk_log.ts_nsec)=0
  OFFSET(printk_log.len)=8
  OFFSET(printk_log.text_len)=10
  OFFSET(printk_log.dict_len)=12
  LENGTH(free_area.free_list)=6
  NUMBER(NR_FREE_PAGES)=0
  NUMBER(PG_lru)=4
  NUMBER(PG_private)=13
  NUMBER(PG_swapcache)=10
  NUMBER(PG_swapbacked)=19
  NUMBER(PG_slab)=9
  NUMBER(PG_hwpoison)=22
  NUMBER(PG_head_mask)=65536
  NUMBER(PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE)=-129
  NUMBER(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR)=2
  NUMBER(PAGE_OFFLINE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE)=-257
  NUMBER(VA_BITS)=52
  NUMBER(kimage_voffset)=0xffff7fff7d600000
  NUMBER(PHYS_OFFSET)=0x80000000
  KERNELOFFSET=0
  CRASHTIME=1574096441

phys_base    : 80000000 (vmcoreinfo)

max_mapnr    : c00000
There is enough free memory to be done in one cycle.

Buffer size for the cyclic mode: 3145728
va_bits      : 47
page_offset  : ffffc00000000000
calculate_plat_config: Parm64: Can't detd
[FAILED] Failed to start Kdump Vmcore Save Service.


< reboot >


CAN YOU ADD A VERSION BANNER TO THE MAKEDUMPFILE SO WE CAN BE SURE OF WHAT IS 
BEING USED WHEN IT STARTS ?

Thanks ! 









> k
> 

> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_mailman_listinfo_kexec&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=t2fPg9D87F7D8jm0_3CG9yoiIKdRg4qc_thBw4bzMhc&m=yaIr-WZNVYousyfxDrAInpTgEW0nPszxryxHQtvXrDQ&s=2n_H5NpvTcxlrmKKuAqZtmrMsLwrb8Y5l5kKKyjnJ8g&e=
>  


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to