On 12/10/21 12:55 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
From: Chen Zhou <chenzho...@huawei.com>
The lower bounds of crash kernel reservation and crash kernel low
reservation are different, use the consistent value CRASH_ALIGN.
Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzho...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donne...@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleik...@oracle.com>
Acked-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donne...@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 5cc60996eac56d6..6424ee4f23da2cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
return 0;
}
- low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, CRASH_ALIGN, 0, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX);
+ low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ALIGN,
+ CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX);
if (!low_base) {
pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try
smaller size.\n",
(unsigned long)(low_size >> 20));
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
