On 2021/12/30 18:40, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 06:14:59PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Dave, Baoquan, Borislav:
>> What do you think about the introduction of parse_crashkernel_high_low()?
>> If everyone
>> doesn't object, I'll bring it to the next version. But I'll make some
>> adjustments to the
>> patches, see below. If there's any objection, I still strongly recommend
>> removing the
>> parameters "system_ram" and "crash_base" of parse_crashkernel_{high,low}().
>>
>> How about splitting __parse_crashkernel() into two parts? One for parsing
>> "crashkernel=X[@offset]", another one for parsing "crashkernel=X,{high,low}"
>> and other
>> suffixes in the future. So the parameter requirements are clear at the
>> lowest level.
>
> First of all, please do not top post!
>
> Now, I already explained to you what I'd like to see:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/Ycs3kpZD/vpoo...@zn.tnic
>
> yet you still don't get it.
>
> So let me make myself clear: in its current form, this is not really an
> improvement so for all x86 changes:
>
> NAKed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
>
OK, thanks for your immediate reply, so I can take less detours.
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
