Hi lizhe, On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:38:57 -0700 lizhe <sensor1...@163.com> wrote:
> When ck_cmdline is NULL, the only caller of get_last_crashkernel() > has already done non-NULL check(see __parse_crashkernel()), > so it doesn't make any sense to make a check here sorry, but I still don't like the description. What I don't understand in particular is why you are mentioning the caller (__parse_crashkernel) here. ck_cmdline is a local variable to get_last_crashkernel. So the caller cannot perform any check on the variable but only the return value of the function. So the patch description should describe why we can remove the additional return NULL without changing the behavior of the function. Thanks Philipp > Signed-off-by: lizhe <sensor1...@163.com> > --- > kernel/crash_core.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c > index 256cf6db573c..c232f01a2c54 100644 > --- a/kernel/crash_core.c > +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c > @@ -222,9 +222,6 @@ static __init char *get_last_crashkernel(char *cmdline, > p = strstr(p+1, name); > } > > - if (!ck_cmdline) > - return NULL; > - > return ck_cmdline; > } > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
