On Mon 2023-12-04 09:56:28, Joel Granados wrote: > Hey Petr > > I missed this message somehow.... > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:07:43PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Tue 2023-11-07 14:45:07, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote: > > > From: Joel Granados <j.grana...@samsung.com> > > > > > > This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the > > > empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which > > > will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time > > > memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link : > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/zo5yx5jfoggi%2f...@bombadil.infradead.org/) > > > > > > rm sentinel element from printk_sysctls > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.grana...@samsung.com> > > > > I am a bit sceptical if the size and time reduction is worth the > > effort. I feel that this change makes the access a bit less secure. > In what way "less secure"? Can you expand on that? > > Notice that if you pass a pointer to the register functions, you will > get a warning/error on compilation.
I have vague memories that some arrays were not static or the length has been somehow manipulated. But I might be wrong. You are right that it should be safe with the static arrays. And the NULL sentinel might be more error-prone after all. Let's forget my mumbles. Best Regards, Petr
