If crash_base is equal to CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, it also indicates that
the crashkernel memory is allocated from high memory. However, the
current check only considers the case where crash_base is greater than
CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX. Fix it.

This patch also includes some minor cleanups.

Fixes: 0ab97169aa05 ("crash_core: add generic function to do reservation")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytco...@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/crash_core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
index efe87d501c8c..d4313b53837e 100644
--- a/kernel/crash_core.c
+++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static __initdata char *suffix_tbl[] = {
  * It returns 0 on success and -EINVAL on failure.
  */
 static int __init parse_crashkernel_suffix(char *cmdline,
-                                          unsigned long long   *crash_size,
+                                          unsigned long long *crash_size,
                                           const char *suffix)
 {
        char *cur = cmdline;
@@ -268,9 +268,9 @@ static int __init __parse_crashkernel(char *cmdline,
                             unsigned long long *crash_base,
                             const char *suffix)
 {
-       char    *first_colon, *first_space;
-       char    *ck_cmdline;
-       char    *name = "crashkernel=";
+       char *first_colon, *first_space;
+       char *ck_cmdline;
+       char *name = "crashkernel=";
 
        BUG_ON(!crash_size || !crash_base);
        *crash_size = 0;
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel_generic(char *cmdline,
                return;
        }
 
-       if ((crash_base > CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX) &&
+       if ((crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX) &&
             crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
                memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
                return;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to