On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 at 10:54, Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On 04/12/24 at 03:28pm, Dave Young wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 12:23, Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Jiri reported that the current kexec_dprintk() always prints out > > > debugging message whenever kexec/kdmmp loading is triggered. That is > > > not wanted. The debugging message is supposed to be printed out when > > > 'kexec -s -d' is specified for kexec/kdump loading. > > > > > > After investigating, the reason is the current kexec_dprintk() takes > > > printk(KERN_INFO) or printk(KERN_DEBUG) depending on whether '-d' is > > > specified. However, distros usually have defaulg log level like below: > > > > > > [~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk > > > 7 4 1 7 > > > > > > So, even though '-d' is not specified, printk(KERN_DEBUG) also always > > > prints out. I thought printk(KERN_DEBUG) is equal to pr_debug(), it's > > > not. > > > > > > Fix it by changing to use pr_info() instead which are expected to work. > > > > Could you also update the kernel/crash_core.c and > > kernel/crash_reserve.c to include the filename prefix? > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt > > When I added pr_fmt() to kernel/crash_reserve.c and tested code, the > printed boot log about crashkernel reservation is changed as below: > > [ +0.000000] crash_reserve: crashkernel reserved: 0x000000007d000000 - > 0x0000000095000000 (384 MB) > > When I looked around, I noticed all other lines around don't have the > module name printed out. Seems it's not appropriate to add one for > crashkernel alone. And the kexec_dprintk() doesn't exist in > kernel/crash_reserve.c. Furthermore, the kexec_dprintk() is added to > enable debugging printing for kexec_file_load when loading kexec/kdump > kernel. This crashkernel reservation may not be related. Combinbed these > all, I would suggest not adding pr_fmt() for kernel/crash_reserve.c for > now, let's add pr_fmt() for kernel/crash_core.c, what do you think?
Hi Baoquan, I'm fine with it. But adding pr_fmt is always good as all the pr_* will have a prefix instead of manually add "crashkernel:" in every pr_warn etc. There are indeed a few without any prefix in this file though. But it can be done separately, not necessary to be done here together with the debug print though. Thanks Dave > > > > > > > > > Fixes: cbc2fe9d9cb2 ("kexec_file: add kexec_file flag to control debug > > > printing") > > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> > > > Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jirisl...@kernel.org> > > > Closes: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/4c775fca-5def-4a2d-8437-7130b0272...@kernel.org > > > --- > > > v1->v2: > > > - Change to use pr_info() only when "kexec -s -d" is specified. With > > > this change, those debugging message for "kexec -c -d" of kexec_load > > > will be missed. We'll see if we need add them for kexec_load too, if > > > someone explicitly requests it. > > > > > > include/linux/kexec.h | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h > > > index 060835bb82d5..f31bd304df45 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h > > > @@ -461,10 +461,8 @@ static inline void arch_kexec_pre_free_pages(void > > > *vaddr, unsigned int pages) { > > > > > > extern bool kexec_file_dbg_print; > > > > > > -#define kexec_dprintk(fmt, ...) \ > > > - printk("%s" fmt, \ > > > - kexec_file_dbg_print ? KERN_INFO : KERN_DEBUG, \ > > > - ##__VA_ARGS__) > > > +#define kexec_dprintk(fmt, arg...) \ > > > + do { if (kexec_file_dbg_print) pr_info(fmt, ##arg); } while (0) > > > > > > #else /* !CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */ > > > struct pt_regs; > > > -- > > > 2.41.0 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec