On 6/27/24 23:27, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> Hello Boris,
> 
> On 6/24/2024 10:59 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:57:34PM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>>> ...  Hence, added simple static functions make_pte_private() and
>>> set_pte_enc() to make use of the more optimized snp_set_memory_private() to
>>> use the GHCB instead of the MSR protocol. Additionally, make_pte_private()
>>> adds check for GHCB addresses during unshare_all_memory() loop.
>> IOW, what you're saying is: "Boris, what you're asking can't be done."
>>
>> Well, what *you're* asking - for me to maintain crap - can't be done either.
>> So this will stay where it is.
>>
>> Unless you make a genuine effort and refactor the code...
> 
> There is an issue with calling __set_clr_pte_enc() here for the 
> _bss_decrypted section being made private again,
> 
> when calling __set_clr_pte_enc() on _bss_decrypted section pages, 
> clflush_cache_range() will fail as __va()
> 
> on this physical range fails as the bss_decrypted section pages are not in 
> kernel direct map.
> 
> Hence, clflush_cache_range() in __set_clr_pte_enc() causes an implicit page 
> state change which is not resolved as below and causes fatal guest exit :
> 
> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: memory fault: GPA 0x4000000 size 0x1000 flags 
> 0x8 kvm_convert_memory start 0x4000000 size 0x1000 shared_to_private
> 
> ...
> 
> KVM: unknown exit reason 24 EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 
> EDX=00000000 ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=00000000 EIP=00000000 
> EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> 
> ...
> 
> This is the reason why i had to pass the vaddr to set_pte_enc(), added here 
> for kexec code, so that i can use it for clflush_cache_range().
> 
> So for specific cases such as this, where we can't call __set_clr_pte_enc() 
> on _bss_decrypted section, we probably need a separate set_pte_enc().

You can probably add a va parameter, that when not NULL, is used for the
flush. If NULL, then use the __va() macro on the pa.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thanks, Ashish
> 

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to