On 12/17/25 10:40, [email protected] wrote: > But ultimately I will format the code in whatever manner is requested.
Honestly, it looks like folks just copied the code from wherever it came and completely ignored _any_ sane column limits. It's not about $FOO columns or $BAR columns. It's about having code that's readable and maintainable. The key issue here is that there's been no apparent effort to try to make the code readable and maintainable. Am I wrong? Next steps: First, try to make the code readable and maintainable. If you can do that under 80 columns, great. Aim for 80. If doing 85 or 100 makes the code more readable or maintainable, that's OK too. But I'm a little discouraged that we're at v15 and talking about "readable and maintainable". That's RFC fodder, not v15.
